So, you’re the chief wellness officer of the Wellness Institute at the Cleveland Clinic, huh?
Okay, then. Shoot.
“Listening to finer music...
Hold on. Because you’re presumably someone with a scientific background, I’d like to ask you one quick question: How did you go about defining “finer” as it pertains to music? See, the reason I ask is because without a proper definition, i.e., some quantifiable differences between types (styles, aesthetics, philosophies?) of music, whatever you say next will be inherently flawed.
Hello?
“Listening to finer music and attending concerts on a consistent basis...
The same goes for the terms “attendance,” “concerts” and “consistent.”
...makes your real age about four years younger,” Dr. Michael F. Roizen — the chief wellness officer of the Wellness Institute at the Cleveland Clinic, said recently.
Uh-huh. So if I smoke four year’s worth of crack, but attend finer music concerts consistently, I’ll be my normal age? Sweet. [puff, puff]
-
Dr. Roizen is one of a number of [cough] experts, Matthew Gurewitsch of the NY Times quotes in his recent article, presumably titled by a junior high school yearbook editor:
Composing Concertos in the Key of Rx
It’s an interesting glance at the potential of specifically designed music to clinically heal certain health-related symptoms, such as hypertension.
While I think the ideas are worthwhile, their science is...hmm...wanting. Too bad Muzak filed for chapter 11, they might’ve been able to help.
-
Showing posts with label music therapy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label music therapy. Show all posts
3/31/09
Rx for...Good Luck!
Posted by Empiricus at 12:00 PM 5 comments
Labels: editors go to seedy motels to come up with titles, Matthew Gurewitsch, music and science, music therapy, Muzak, NY Times
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)