1. Kurt Weill studied with Busoni, who studied with Wilhelm Keinzl, who studied with Franz Lizst, who studied with Anton Reicha, who studied with Antonio Salieri, who studied with Geovanni Battista Pescetti, who studied with Antonio Lotti, who studied with Giovanni Legrenzi... in 1660-ish.
2. Weill’s Violin Concerto is, decidedly, a modernist work, yet with an inclination towards neoclassicism and romanticism. It is not and cannot be a blank slate. Can any music ever be?
3. It is true that Weill’s idealism, as exemplified in his comic-operas Die Bürgschaft (1931) and Der Silbersee (1932), made the Nazis mad, forcing him to “relocate,” as it were. Thus, being a political progressive (and a Jew) was not particularly beneficial to his personhood.
Now, since we have facts, why say this about Brahms?
But the connection to Weill? By contrast, Brahms was a composer steeped in history:
Just like Weill, who borrowed from Busoni, who borrowed from Keinzl, who borrowed from Lizst, who... wait.. contrast?
The "Requiem" purposefully borrows Bach's fugues and Beethoven's escalating climaxes...
Why not purposefully imitate Ludwig? Right? He goes down with the most ardor. Ladies.
...in its effort to render its vision of divine comfort universal and timeless.
“My name is Johannes. I like to fugue* and climax. That makes my piece timeless. But you’ll never find that in a history book, because I never said that.”
The group's generous performance ennobled the sentiment, but Weill's brash tabula rasa was a reminder that Brahms's idealism, however well-intentioned, was part of a societal worldview that ultimately led to the trenches of the Great War.
But... but... I... you... wait, what??? He’s a lover not a fighter.
These are the actual causes of World War I: the HMS Dreadnought, Karl Marx, revanchism, irredentism and the Franco-Prussian War, not fugue-ing nor climaxing, nor musical history-having.
Also, Weill's music is not a blank slate (tabula rasa).
For Weill, looking forward was automatically a better view than looking back.
Except that he had to defect from Germany, because he looked forward.
Implied, perhaps: the Nazi’s liked Brahms? Did you know that Schoenberg liked Brahms?
Matthew, I think it would be of great advantage to read one of Arnold's articles, especially the one titled Brahms the Progressive, written in 1947. You can find it in Style and Idea. It’s really good, and progressive, which is awesome, but only in some cases, unlike Weill’s, who had to flee Germany, because he borrowed from Busoni (a socialist), who borrowed from Keinzl, who borrowed from Lizst, who borrowed from Reicha, who borrowed from Salieri, who borrowed from Pescetti, who borrowed from Lotti, who borrowed from Legrenzi.
* In some languages fugue is a four-letter word.
-
Showing posts with label Kurt Weill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kurt Weill. Show all posts
3/19/08
I... You... Wait, What? History???
Posted by Empiricus at 1:20 PM 4 comments
Labels: Arnold Schoenberg, Ferruccio Busoni, Johannes Brahms, Kurt Weill, Matthew Guerrieri, Modernsism, Nazis
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)