tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3371351138596055444.post2518580040829258492..comments2024-01-20T23:55:26.269-08:00Comments on The Detritus Review: Regarding An Exciting Major Musicological Discovery!Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3371351138596055444.post-68969530282719945592008-02-07T06:37:00.000-08:002008-02-07T06:37:00.000-08:00Pretty tacky, indeed, but it could have read that ...Pretty tacky, indeed, but it could have read that he is at the "'often runs urgently to the restroom but then finds difficulty in acheiving a strong stream, which often leads to akward moments of standing there unable to finish the job but knowing fully that as soon as he leaves he will have to rush back in a matter of minutes' stage of life"<BR/><BR/>Getting old sucks, even for composers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3371351138596055444.post-92048192362496595572008-02-06T10:00:00.000-08:002008-02-06T10:00:00.000-08:00I can't find it now, but I'm absolutely certain th...I can't find it now, but I'm absolutely certain that another reviewer used the ""little blue pill" stage of his life" thing in another piece you guys wrote about.<BR/><BR/>There's probably a tackier way to say that a guy is old. I just can't think of one.Aaronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16371363571092946834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3371351138596055444.post-78317590073569610122008-02-06T03:52:00.000-08:002008-02-06T03:52:00.000-08:00Right, but for it to be truly a typo, the "our" of...Right, but for it to be truly a typo, the "our" of "fourth" must have been randomly struck rather than the "if" of "fifth." <BR/><BR/>I find that difficult to fathom. This was an error of factual recall, not keyboarding technique.Murderfacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01220337199108444992noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3371351138596055444.post-78022665834453290002008-02-05T21:12:00.000-08:002008-02-05T21:12:00.000-08:00As far as typos go, I think I can let this one pas...As far as typos go, I think I can let this one pass. I mean, between the two words, "fifth" and "fourth", there were eleven letters. Six were duplicates, indicating that 3 of the 5.5 letters of each of the two words, remained the same. This translates to a 55% successful accuracy rate; thus, demonstrating the that it was merely a minor infraction. Though, it is easy to see how this minor error could have occurred: each of the incorrect letters are no more than three inches apart from one another on a standard "qwerty" keyboard. See? No biggie.Empiricushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11629835829400843701noreply@blogger.com